This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com […] been writing for a long while about how Todoist is my brain. I’ve been using it since 2014 and every year it has gotten better and better at doing what I […]
Managing my Research Pipeline using Todoist
This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com I’ve been writing for a long while about how Todoist is my brain. I’ve been using it since 2014 and every year it has gotten better and better at doing what I love: manage my tasks. Want to learn how to use Todoist […]
Comment on Can evaluators be the bridge in the research-practice gap? by Lamin Barrow
This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com Thinking of evaluators as brokers or intermediaries between researchers and practitioners is one of the best scenarios to position the work of the evaluators. As an evaluation and also a research enthusiast, I have been providing that bridge for my organization that is […]
Comment on Evaluation is Not Applied Research by Quinn Mitchell
This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com Dr. Wazer, Thank you for your blog and for your interview with Dr. Pann on YouTube regarding your research; I found it very interesting. I am also a grad student at ASU studying Learning Design and Technology. Like Kerry, I found the hourglass […]
Comment on Evaluation is Not Applied Research by Dana Wanzer
This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com In reply to Kerry Keating. Lovely question, Kerry! I didn’t probe too much into epistemologies or ontologies underlying these definitions, but I can imagine you have something there with your question. I would bet that post-positivists would be more aligned with the “evaluation […]
Comment on Evaluation is Not Applied Research by Kerry Keating
This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com Hello Dr. Wanzer, I am a Master’s in Education student currently studying the difference between research and evaluation. I had always struggled grasping the differences in the two, and felt they were just carbon copies of each other, just under different names. This […]
Comment on Dissertation RQ3: How do researchers and evaluators differ in use, interpersonal factors, and research/evaluation factors? by Cristina
This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com Hello Dr. Wanzer. I hope all is well. I came across your website through a YouTube video on research and evaluation on James Pann’s Channel. I am currently a graduate student at ASU and working on a class discussion project that prompted us […]
Comment on Dissertation RQ2: To what extent do interpersonal factors relate to use beyond research factors? by полное описание
This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com полное описание blog topic
Comment on Why I love Perusall by How India Can Beat China?
This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com How India Can Beat China? blog topic
Comment on Teaching like Evaluation by Ungrading and the Logic of Evaluation
This is an Eval Central archive copy, find the original at danawanzer.com […] not knowing how to grade themselves, particularly when the criteria may be more amorphous. Students have previously only really been involved in step 3 of the logic of evaluation process: receiving their individual grades on assignments. They are rarely involved in developing […]